Capture while the picture is intact
Record the issue at the point it is clearest, before translation and shortening start to weaken it.
Building Analyst
Keep the original finding strong enough for the next action.
Current product direction for issue capture, evidence retention, and handover clarity.
Building Analyst is being shaped around one operational job: keep location, evidence, urgency, and next-step intent together as work moves between people.
Issue flow
Designed to preserve signal
Capture
Issue recorded with evidence attached
- Location stays explicit
- Images remain attached
- Priority stays visible
Handover
The next person receives the issue with enough of the original picture intact to act without rebuilding the context first.
What it is
A product direction built around issue capture and stronger handover.
Building Analyst is not framed as a general AI dashboard. It is framed as a way to stop inspection and site findings losing operational force once they leave the original observer.
Keep the evidence bound to the issue
Retain image, location, urgency, and next-step intent together instead of scattering them across separate channels.
Hand over something usable
The next person should be able to move from the issue file itself, not from a thinner retelling of it.
What exists now
The current proof is in the operating model, not in inflated rollout claims.
Issue-file structure
The model already defines what needs to stay attached to an issue as it moves.
Sector fit
The use case is grounded in property, FM, compliance, and built-environment operations where evidence degrades through handovers.
Clear limits
No customer metrics or deployment claims are being implied here. This page is deliberately honest about the stage of the product.
What to bring
One issue that lost clarity between the finding and the action.
That is enough to test fit. If the example is real, the friction points usually appear quickly.